Showing posts with label quantum physics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quantum physics. Show all posts

Saturday, October 24, 2015

Time, Space, and Consciousness, Part Two: The Possibility of Time Travel...





cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Time, Space, and Consciousness, Part One: The Nature of Light with Fred ...






AMAZING SERIES WITH FRED ALAN WOLFE


cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 19, 2015

Scientists Confirm That Reality is an Illusion Our 3D Universe Is A Ho...





cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Is Our Universe a Fake?

new illuminati: Is Our Universe a Fake?: Is Our Universe a Fake? by Robert Lawrence Kuhn I began bemused. The notion that humanity might be living in an artif...



cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

First Evidence In Space Of Parallel Universes - Our Universe Could Be Part Of A Soap Bubble

First Evidence In Space Of Parallel Universes - Our Universe Could Be Part Of A Soap Bubble - 





cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Monday, January 13, 2014

A Jewel at the Heart of Quantum Physics/CHINTAMANI?

A Jewel at the Heart of Quantum Physics

cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Are we all living inside a virtual simulation? The Movie 2013



cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Sunday, September 29, 2013

A Jewel at the Heart of Quantum Physics

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Fred Alan Wolf: Part 1 Complete Shamanic Physics -- A Thinking Allowed ...



cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

All we see & seem is but a dream within a dream


cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Thursday, April 18, 2013

2. The Illusion of Time

Time. We waste it, save it, kill it, make it. The world runs on it. Yet ask physicists what time actually is, and the answer might shock you: They have no idea. Even more surprising, the deep sense we have of time passing from present to past may be nothing more than an illusion. How can our understanding of something so familiar be so wrong? 

In search of answers, Brian Greene takes us on the ultimate time-traveling adventure, hurtling 50 years into the future before stepping into a wormhole to travel back to the past. Along the way, he will reveal a new way of thinking about time in which moments past, present, and future—from the reign of T. rex to the birth of your great-great-grandchildren—exist all at once. 

This journey will bring us all the way back to the Big Bang, where physicists think the ultimate secrets of time may be hidden. You'll never look at your wristwatch the same way again.



Monday, April 8, 2013

Michio Kaku: How to Program a Quantum Computer




cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Share/Bookmark

VENITI CU NOI IN ISRAEL!

Sunday, March 31, 2013

Holographic Universe: Unexpected Mysterious Glitches In Our Simulated Reality


MessageToEagle.com – Are you ready to go on a fascinating journey and explore the matrix?
We will once again discuss the idea that we might live in a computer simulation created by an unknown highly advanced civilization.

This time we will examine the possibility that there could be a number of “faked” universes and if we live in a simulated reality we should expect to see occasional sudden glitches, small drifts in the supposed constants and laws of Nature over time.

As previously stated it is quite possible that our Universe is a gigantic and wonderfully detailed holographic illusion.

Our life, and everything around us might be part of a vast, living and 3D holographic simulation conducted by “someone” invisible and superior to everything known in the universe! Is it the ultimate computer game of the superior ones?

Obviously we have no idea who created this complex simulation, but we can always speculate. Rich Terrell, from the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology who has helped to design missions to Mars, discovered four new moons around Saturn, Neptune and Uranus and taken pictures of the distant solar system has his opinion about our creator.
Terrell believes our creator is a cosmic computer programmer.

“One has to think what are the requirements for God? God is an inter-dimensional being connected with everything in the Universe, a creator that is responsible for the Universe and in some way can change the laws of physics, if he wanted to. I think those are good requirements for what God ought to be,” Terrell says.

Using a supercomputer and other calculations, researchers have also discovered that there are striking similarities between the unknown laws that govern the Universe and human brain.
The scientists who conducted the study are not saying we are living in a holographic world, but according to the study, the results are not a coincidence.

“By no means do we claim that the universe is a global brain or a computer,” said study co-author Dmitri Krioukov at the University of California-San Diego.

“But the discovered equivalence between the growth of the universe and complex networks strongly suggests that unexpectedly similar laws govern the dynamics of these very different complex systems.”

According to John D. Barrow, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University we should seriously consider the possibility that our superior programmers could have created several faked universes and these computer simulations can contain errors. In his science paper, Living in a Simulated Universe, John D. Barrow writes “

Once you take seriously that all possible universes can (or do) exist then a slippery slope opens up before you. It has long been recognised that technical civilisations, only a little more advanced than ourselves, will have the capability to simulate universes in which self-conscious entities can emerge and communicate with one another.
It is probable there are glitches in a simulated reality.
 
They would have computer power that differed from ours by a vast factor. Instead of merely simulating their weather or the formation of galaxies, like we do, they would be able to go further and watch the appearance of stars and planetary systems.


Then, having coupled the rules of biochemistry into their astronomical simulations they would be able to watch the evolution of life and consciousness (all speeded up to occur on whatever timescale was convenient for them). 

Just as we watch the life cycles of fruit flies they would be able to follow the evolution of life, watch civilisations grow and communicate with each other, argue about whether there existed a Great Programmer in the Sky who created their Universe and who could intervene at will in defiance of the laws of Nature they habitually observed.

Once this capability to simulate universe is achieved, fake universes will proliferate and will soon greatly outnumber the real ones.”

Scientists have announced that they found what can be considered the first evidence of parallel universes.The idea that our Universe could be a small component within a vast assemblage of other universes that together make up a “multiverse” has been treated by physicists as intriguing, but so far it has remained in the realm of theory without any experimental tests that could support it.  That might change now when a team of scientists has found evidence that other universes, as well as our own actually lie within “bubbles” of space and time.

“The multiverse scenario was suggested by some cosmologists as a way to avoid the conclusion that the Universe was specially designed for life by a Grand Designer.
Others saw it as a way to avoid having to say anything more about the problem of fine tuning at all.

We see that once conscious observers are allowed to intervene in the universe, rather than being merely lumped into the category of ‘observers’ who do nothing, that we end up with a scenario in which the gods reappear in unlimited numbers in the guise of the simulators who have power of life and death over the simulated realities that they bring into being. The simulators determine the laws, and can change the laws, that govern their worlds. They can engineer anthropic fine-tunings
Our lives and destiny can be decided by our creators. Image: Prometheus movie
 
They can pull the plug on the simulation at any moment, intervene or distance themselves from their simulation; watch as the simulated creatures argue about whether there is a god who controls of intervenes; work miracles or impose their ethical principles upon the simulated reality. 


All the time they can avoid having even a twinge of conscience about hurting anyone because their toy reality isn’t real, is it? They can even watch their simulated realities grow to a level of sophistication that allows them to simulate higher-order realities of their own.
Faced with these perplexities do we have any chance of winnowing fake realities from true?

What we might expect to see if we made scientific observations from within a simulated reality?
Firstly, the simulators will have been tempted to avoid the complexity of using a consistent set of laws of Nature in their worlds when they can simply patch in “realistic” effects, “John D. Barrow explains.

John D. Barrow points out that even the most intelligent programmers would create programs with errors and it is a matter of time before we detect what he calls “glitches”.

“Even if the simulators were scrupulous about simulating the laws of Nature, there would be limits to what they could do.

Assuming the simulators, or at least the early generations of them, have a very advanced knowledge of the laws of Nature, it’s likely they would still have incomplete knowledge of them (some philosophers of science would argue this must always be the case). They may know a lot about the physics and programming needed to simulate a universe but there will be gaps or, worse still, errors in their knowledge of the laws of Nature.

They would of course be subtle and far from obvious, otherwise our “advanced” civilisation wouldn’t be advanced. These lacunae do not prevent simulations being created and running smoothly for long periods of time. But gradually the little flaws will begin to build up.

Eventually, their effects would snowball and these realities would cease to compute. The only escape is if their creators intervene to patch up the problems one by one as they arise. This is a solution that will be very familiar to the owner of any home computer who receives regular updates in order to protect it against new forms of invasion or repair gaps that its original creators had not foreseen.

The creators of a simulation could offer this type of temporary protection, updating the working laws of Nature to include extra things they had learnt since the simulation was initiated.
In this kind of situation, logical contradictions will inevitably arise and the laws in the simulations will appear to break down now and again. 

The inhabitants of the simulation – especially the simulated scientists – will occasionally be puzzled by the experimental results they obtain. The simulated astronomers might, for instance, make observations that show that their so-called constants of Nature are very slowly changing7.
Can strange stories of people vanishing into thin air be explained as glitches in the simulation?
 
It’s likely there could even be sudden glitches in the laws that govern these simulated realities. This is because the simulators would most likely use a technique that has been found effective in all other simulations of complex systems: the use of error-correcting codes to put things back on track.


Take our genetic code, for example. If it were left to its own devices we would not last very long. Errors would accumulate and death and mutation would quickly follow. We are protected from this by the existence of a mechanism for error correction that identifies and corrects mistakes in genetic coding. Many of our complex computer systems possess the same type of internal ‘spell-checker’ to guard against error accumulation.

If the simulators used error-correcting computer codes to guard against the fallibility of their simulations as a whole (as well as simulating them on a smaller scale in our genetic code) then every so often a correction would take place to the state or the laws governing the simulation.
Are we just participating in a simulated game?
 
Mysterious sudden changes would occur that would appear to contravene the very laws of Nature that the simulated scientists were in the habit of observing and predicting.


So we conclude that if we live in a simulated reality we should expect occasional sudden glitches, small drifts in the supposed constants and laws of Nature over time, and a dawning realisation that the flaws of Nature are as important as the laws of Nature for our understanding of true reality,” John D. Barrow says.

The holographic universe theory remains fascinating, not only to the public, but also to physicists and other scientists. That is why a team of physicists at the University of Washington has come up with a potential test to see if we truly live in a matrix.
Are you ready to find out the truth?

© MessageToEagle.com

cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark  

VENITI CU NOI IN ISRAEL!

THE ILLUSION OF TIME

Time. We waste it, save it, kill it, make it. The world runs on it. Yet ask physicists what time actually is, and the answer might shock you: They have no idea. Even more surprising, the deep sense we have of time passing from present to past may be nothing more than an illusion.

 How can our understanding of something so familiar be so wrong? In search of answers, Brian Greene takes us on the ultimate time-traveling adventure, hurtling 50 years into the future before stepping into a wormhole to travel back to the past. 

Along the way, he will reveal a new way of thinking about time in which moments past, present, and future—from the reign of T. rex to the birth of your great-great-grandchildren—exist all at once. This journey will bring us all the way back to the Big Bang, where physicists think the ultimate secrets of time may be hidden. You'll never look at your wristwatch the same way again.




cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

VENITI CU NOI IN ISRAEL IN AUGUST 2013!

Friday, March 29, 2013

The Quantum Apocalypse of The Holographic Universe



cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

VENITI CU NOI IN ISRAEL IN AUGUST 2013!

Thursday, March 28, 2013

The Primer Fields



In this video series the currently accepted theories of physics and astrophysics are shaken to the core by a radical new theory of the fundamental forces in all matter.

You will be amazed as a magnetic model of the dome at CERN is used to create a 100 mm diameter plasma Sun with a 300 mm diameter equatorial disc of plasma around it!

All the plasma videos are actual footage with no enhancement or manipulation other than speed. In other words, this is real thing. Hard to believe, but it is all true.




cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

CALATORITI CU NOI IN ISRAEL!

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Dr Quantum explains the Double slit experiment, entanglement and flatland.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Through the wormhole S1E06 - Are we alone(FULL)

Friday, October 5, 2012

Reality is a computer projection: physicists


What we call reality might actually be the output of a program running on a cosmos-sized quantum computer
October 4, 2012
[+]princess_leia_star_wars
Is our reality a projection of information, like the hologram image of Princess Leia projected by R2D2 in Star Wars? (Credit: Lucasfilm)

Whatever kind of reality you think you’re living in, you’re probably wrong. The universe is a computer, and everything that goes on in it can be explained in terms of information processing, speculates New Scientist in a special issue on What is reality?

“Quantum physics is almost phrased in terms of information processing,” says Vlatko Vedral of the University of Oxford. “It’s suggestive that you will find information processing at the root of everything.”
In fact, every process in the universe can be reduced to interactions between particles that produce binary answers: yes or no, here or there, up or down. 

That means nature, at its most fundamental level, is simply the flipping of binary digits or bits, just like a computer. The result of the myriad bit flips is manifest in what we perceive as the ongoing arrangement, rearrangement and interaction of atoms — in other words, reality.

According to Ed Fredkin of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, if we could dig into this process we would find that the universe follows just one law, a single information-processing rule that is all you need to build a cosmos. In Fredkin’s view, this would be some form of “if-then” procedure; the kind of rule used in traditional computing to manipulate the bits held by transistors on a chip and operate the logic gates, but this time applied to the bits of the universe.

Proving that the universe is a quantum computer is a difficult task. Even so, there is one observation that supports the idea that the universe is fundamentally composed of information. In 2008, the GEO 600 gravitational wave detector in Hannover, Germany, picked up an anomalous signal suggesting that space-time is pixelated. This is exactly what would be expected in a “holographic” universe, where 3D reality is actually a projection of information encoded on the two-dimensional surface of the boundary of the universe (New Scientist, 17 January 2009, p 24).

This bizarre idea arose from an argument over black holes. One of the fundamental tenets of physics is that information cannot be destroyed, but a black hole appears to violate this by swallowing things that contain information then gradually evaporating away. What happens to that information was the subject of a long debate between Stephen Hawking and several of his peers. In the end, Hawking lost the debate, conceding that the information is imprinted on the event horizon that defines the black hole’s boundary and escapes as the black hole evaporates.

This led theoretical physicists Leonard Susskind and Gerard’t Hooft to propose that the entire universe could also hold information at its boundary — with the consequence that our reality could be the projection of that information into the space within the boundary.


http://www.kurzweilai.net/reality-is-a-computer-projection-physicists
cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Parallel Universes - BBC Horizon


Everything you're about to read here seems impossible and insane, beyond science fiction. Yet it's all true.

Scientists now believe there may really be a parallel universe - in fact, there may be an infinite number of parallel universes, and we just happen to live in one of them. These other universes contain space, time and strange forms of exotic matter. Some of them may even contain you, in a slightly different form. Astonishingly, scientists believe that these parallel universes exist less than one millimetre away from us. In fact, our gravity is just a weak signal leaking out of another universe into ours.


cybershamans (karmapolice) / CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Share/Bookmark

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites